Can You See Ridiculous?

CAST HER INTO A BED BY GOD!

word “flesh” is multiplied in KJVB.

Come on!  Oh right like God is going to join in on the debauchery and throw the “whore” (a word by the way that was NEVER in any holy book) Harlot into a bed to further her sin.  “PISH POSH” says the self proclaimed ‘scribe of God’.

And it no longer says “I will kill her with death”.  Which is bad enough seeing that “death” is not a way to kill someone at all.  But rather its DEATH itself.  Kill them by hanging.  Kill them by beheading. You don’t “Kill by death”.

Furthermore now this god of the book says “And I will kill her children with death”  Right slaughter those dang rugrats they have it coming due to the whore!  (sarcasm).

Do Not Read Aloud from the Book of Curses and Lies

Yes I am aware of that some Truth is still in the bibles.  I cover the desecration.  God’s words are on my heart.  I no longer need the book.  The book has betrayed me and soon there will be few babies left in the bathwater.  The book will do more harm than good at some point.  Except it seems that the 1/2 blind Christians have forgotten what evil words are.  They turn it all into holy.  Perhaps they are spared the burden to bear.  Idk …its still a strong delusion to be blind to evil and not be aware of evil’s devices.

Revelation 2:26
And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations:
Rev 2:27
And he shall rule them with a rod of iron; as the vessels of a potter shall they be broken to shivers: even as I received of my Father.
Rev 2:28
And I will give him the morning star.

Great, ya power over the nations…”nations”?  Thats just a word for blasphemous political entities whom pretty much need put down.  Then once the power is given they are Broken to shivers?  As Jesus was broken on the cross?  This is a mixed up mess a grammar debauchery.  Broken to shivers–Not a good thing.  Remotely you could surmise to be broken down to be built back up.  But that is not what it says is it?  Furthermore “broken to shivers” sounds pretty pucked up.  And what’s this?  Jesus is going to give God what He already has The morning star?  ….more blasphemy and bs.

The following parable is desecrated by usury.  It was a parable of talents.  Showing spiritual gifts are to be used to gain souls for the Kingdom of God.  It’s now desecrated in 7 ways.

Parable of Money Usage (POUND OF FLESH PARABLE)

AND THEY TURNED TO FABLES (MOVIES)

Here’s the googles theme of the movie “a pound of flesh” that now matches the desecrated parable below.

Literary Analysis of Pound of Flesh

“The themes or central ideas of this phrase include revenge, justice, and mercy. This phrase is a figurative method of expressing a spiteful penalty or a harsh demand – the consequences of non-payment on a distressed bargain.”   Make no mistake the movie came first then the parable to match not the other way around.  Its the same for many of the supernatural bible changes.

 

And as they heard these things, he added and spake (spake new word) a parable, because he was nigh to Jerusalem, and because they thought that the kingdom of God should immediately appear.

 

He said therefore, A certain nobleman (new word) went into a far country to receive for himself a kingdom, and to return.

 

And he called his ten servants, and delivered them ten pounds, and said unto them, Occupy till I come.  (they are proud of there new “occupy the time” phrase.  why is occupy capitalized?  Ask the wolf.)  

But his citizens (new word) hated (“hate” is multiplied in KJVB 87 times) him, and sent a message after him, saying, We (grammar error) will not have this man to reign over us. (the book is comparing a banker and corporate ruthless tyrant to Jesus).

 

And it came to pass, that when he was (grammar error that ain’t old English) returned, having received the kingdom, then he commanded these (error) servants to be called unto him, to whom he had given (overuse of the word “had”, passive) the money, that he might (improper term) know how much every man had (overuse of word “had” as “gained” is already passed tense there is no need for a “had”.) gained by trading.(“trading” really, what is this stock exchange?)

 

Then came the first, (the “first” what?  error) saying, Lord, thy pound hath gained ten pounds.

 

And he said unto him, Well, thou good servant: because thou hast been faithful in a very little, have thou authority over ten cities. (changed from “good and faithful servant”)

 

And the second came, saying, Lord, thy pound hath gained five pounds. (again “the second” what?  error.)

 

And he said likewise to him, Be thou also over five cities. (word “cities” new in KJVB.)

 

 Luk 19:20

And another came, saying, Lord, behold, here is thy pound, which I have kept laid up in a napkin: (reminds me of the movie “pound of flesh”.  Napkin? Really?  Pounds were English money system much later much much later than the writing of KJVB.  This change to the money type is an on going change that has happened several times supernaturally of course.)

 

For I feared thee, because thou art an austere (pish posh austere new word) man: thou takest up that thou layedst not down, and reapest that thou didst not sow.  (So austere guy is a corporate banker thief and an oppressor taking what isn’t his)

 

And he saith unto him, Out (error) of thine own mouth will I judge thee, thou wicked servant. Thou knewest that I was an austere man, taking up that I laid not down, and reaping that I did not sow:

 

Wherefore then gavest not thou my money into the bank, that at my coming I might have required mine own with usury?

 

And he said unto them that stood by, Take from him the pound, and give it to him that hath ten pounds.

 

(And they said unto him, Lord, he hath ten pounds.)

 

For I say unto you, That unto every one which hath shall be given; and from him that hath not, even that he hath shall be taken away from him. (the only truth in the chapter if it pertains to spiritual gifts that are not utilized.  But the chapter no longer makes that clear, does it?)

 

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. (never was the book this brash & violent)

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.