Blatant Beastiality Implications in Proverbs. (If your a KJV bible venerator (Idolizer) you may not want to read this).
Commentary-Once Songs of Solomon did compare the bride and the Love of God together as sweet and beautiful fruits. This comparing sex with your wife to fantasies of bedding animals (hinds & roes) in Proverbs 5:19 is perversion and doesn’t compare to the fruit analogy whatsoever. The reference is tactless and vile as usual as the wolf speaks through the once holy place.
“Let her be as the loving hind and pleasant roe; let her breasts satisfy thee at all times; and be thou ravished always with her love.” Furthermore the word
“RAVISHED” is utterly inappropriate in a holy setting.
I wonder how the preachers will explain this supernatural blasphemy away. Probably with rational and a little changing of the English language itself perhaps.
______________________________________
So who dreams about having sex with a deer when embracing their wife’s breasts? Or post M.E. I guess they would say “deers” like “fishes”. Fantasies of animals during sex is what these passages are now saying. Not to mention (but I will) the terms “always” and “at all times” infer sexual addiction or obsession at best. “Oh that’s not what that means” scream the rational. But it is what it says (reads) isn’t it?
What I have seen when watching Bible commentaries on YT is Christians nowadays since the supernatural KJVB changes -they just go with their pre conceived notions when reading the book and ignore pretty much the actual meaning of the print on the page.
Let thy fountain be blessed: and rejoice with the wife of thy youth.
Let her be as the loving hind and pleasant roe; let her breasts satisfy thee at all times; and be thou ravished always with her love. (breast worship hence the “always” & “at all times” fondle fondle fondle!